Estrategias de lectura en inglés como lengua extranjera: un estudio descriptivo
Abstract
El objetivo de este estudio descriptivo fue determinar si los estudiantes utilizan estrategias de lectura o no. Este estudio descriptivo incluyó la recolección de datos cuantitativos y cualitativos. Los participantes fueron 50 estudiantes, 26 hombres y 24 mujeres; estudiantes de noveno grado cuyas edades oscilaban entre los 12 y los 14 años. Los instrumentos aplicados fueron un par de encuestas para recopilar datos de los participantes sobre estrategias de lectura en EFL, comprensión de textos y problemas que tenían al leer. En segundo lugar, también se realizó una encuesta de lectura cuyos resultados indicaron los conocimientos y estrategias de comprensión lectora de los estudiantes para mejorar su comprensión. Los resultados mostraron que la mayoría de los estudiantes estaban totalmente de acuerdo en la comprensión de sus pasajes, leyendo palabras simples con una media de 1,90 que significa totalmente de acuerdo. Además, los estudiantes traducen palabra por palabra con una media de 1,84, lo que significa que estaban traduciendo al leer. Sobre la base de los hallazgos, se concluye que los alumnos deben aplicar estrategias de lectura para mejorar su capacidad de lectura. Se recomienda que los profesores consideren las mejores estrategias de enseñanza para apoyar a los alumnos durante su desarrollo del aprendizaje.
Downloads
References
2. Al Zoubi, S. (2018). The Impact of Exposure to English Language on Language Acquisition. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(4), 151-162. Available on: www.jallr.com
3. Archer, A., Gleason, M., & Vachon, V. (2003). Decoding and fluency: Foundation skills for struggling older readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(2),89-101. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ676155
4. Ardiana, A. (2015). Improving the students reading comprehension in narrative text through patterned partner reading. Exposure Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggriss, 4(2), 140-155. doi:10.26618/ejpbi.y4i2.923
5. Barr, A. (2006). A Descriptive Study of Reading Strategies for Secondary Education in Minnesota Public Schools. (Thesis, Menomonie, University of Wisconsin-Stout. Retrieved from: http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2006/2006barra.pdf
6. Barreiro, J. (2019). Improving Reading Comprehension of Narrative Texts through Summaries (Master’s thesis, Guayaquil, Universidad Casa Grande). Retrieved from: http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/handle/ucasagrande/ 1893
7. Boardman, A. G., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Murray, C. S., & Kosanovich, M. (2008). Effective instruction for adolescent struggling readers: A practice brief. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
8. Cabanilla, L. (2019). Implementing an Extensive Reading Program by Using a Virtual Library to Improve Vocabulary in Young Learners (Master’s thesis, Guayaquil, Universidad Casa Grande). Retrieved from: http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/handle/ucasagrande/ 1822
9. Catts, H. (2017). Prologue: Reading comprehension is not a single ability. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(3), 73-76. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_LSHSS-16-0033
10. Chamba, M. (2019). Classifying vocabulary, skimming, and scanning to improve reading comprehension (Master’s thesis, Guayaquil, Universidad Casa Grande). Retrieved from: http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/handle/ucasagrande/ 1910
11. Contreras, R. (2019). Classifying parts of the speech to improve reading comprehension in EFL university learners (Master’s thesis, Guayaquil, Universidad Casa Grande). Retrieved from: http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/handle/ucasagrande/ 1820
12. Council of Europe. (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989
13. Courbron, C. (2012). The Correlation between the Three Reading Fluency Subskills and Reading Comprehension in At-risk Adolescent Readers. (Doctoral dissertation, Lynchburg Liberty University). Retrieved from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/58824495.pdf
14. Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Davidson, L. (2019). Quantitative Data: A Comprehensive Overview. Retrieved from: https://www.springboard.com/blog/quantitative-data/
16. Eze, A. (2020). Teaching purpose setting to support reading comprehension for readers. Journal of Educational Studies, 16(2) 227-241. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339457300
17. Grabe, W. (1995). Dilemmas for the development of second language reading abilities. Prospect, 10(2), 38-51. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511667190.039
18. Grabe, W. & Stoller, F. (2011). Teaching and researching reading. NY: Pearson Education Limited.
19. Greenbaum, L. (2015). The Effects of Integrating Encoding and Decoding Instruction on the Word Attack Skills of Second Grade Students Reading below Grade Level (Master's thesis, Baltimore, Goucher College). Retrieved From: https://mdsoar.org/bitstream/handle/11603/1685/MEd_Greenbaum_actionres_Su2015.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1
20. Guthrie, J. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(1), 1-29. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3601_2
21. Haspelmath, M. (2001). Word Classes and Parts of Speech. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Harmer, Jeremy (2007) The Practice of English Language Teaching. 4th ed. London: Longman.
23. Haslam, M. (2019). Parts of Speech. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. 1-8. doi:org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0088
24. Hossain, M. (2015). Teaching Productive Skills to the Students: A Secondary Level Scenario. (Master’s thesis, Dhaka, BRAC University). Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/74352632.pdf
25. Khikmah, L. (2019). Teachers creativity in designing learning activities: Sustaining students' motivation. English Review Journal of English Education, 7(2). 85-92. doi: 10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1639
26. Kurniasih, E. (2011). Teaching the four language skills in primary EFL classroom: Some considerations. Journal of English Teaching, 1(1), 70-81. doi: 10.33541/jet.v1i1.53
27. Lin, Y. (2014). Using key part-of-speech analysis to examine spoken discourse by Taiwanese EFL learners. RECALL, 1(3), 1-17. doi: 10.1017/2FS0958344014000408.
28. Luguaña, J. (2019). Reading Comprehension through Skimming, Scanning, and Parts of Speech (Master’s thesis, Guayaquil, Universidad Casa Grande). Retrieved from: http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/handle/ucasagrande/ 1816
29. McCombes, S. (2015). Descriptive Research. Retrieved from: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/
30. Ministerio de Educación. (2012). The Ecuadorian in-service English teacher standards. Retrieved from: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp /uploads/downloads/2012/09/estandares_2012_ingles_opt.pdf
31. Ministerio de Educación. (2016). English as a foreign language. Retrieved from: https//educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2016/03/EFL1.pdf
32. Miñoza, M., & Montero M. (2019). Reading comprehension level among intermediate learners. Science International, 31(3), 561-568. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30331.05920
33. Moreira, K. (2020). Self-Assessment of Classifying Words into Parts of Speech to Improve Word Recognition and Reading Comprehension (Master’s thesis, Guayaquil, Universidad Casa Grande). Retrieved from: http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/handle/ucasagrande/ 1820
34. Moreira, A. (2020). Classifying Parts of Speech through Google Sheets to Improve Reading Comprehension in EFL Learners (Master’s thesis, Guayaquil, Universidad Casa Grande). Retrieved from: http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/handle/ucasagrande/ 2296
35. Nishanthi, R. (2018). The importance of learning English in today's world. International Journal of trend and scientific research and development, 3(1), 871-874. doi: 10.31142/ijtsrd1906
36. Nurhayati, D., & Fitriana, M. (2018). Effectiveness of summarizing in teaching reading comprehension for EFL students. Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics, 3(1), 33-50. doi: 10.30957/ijoltl. v3i1.403
37. Oakhill, J., Cain, K & Elbro, C. (2015). Understanding and Teaching Reading Comprehension (A Handbook). New York: Routledge.
38. Oliveira, A., Germano, G., & Capellini, S. (2016). Students’ performance in letter identification and lexical process tests. Revista CEFAC, 18(5), 1121-1132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216201618523315
39. Oliver, R., & Young, S. (2016). Improving reading fluency and comprehension in adult ESL learners using bottom-up and top-down vocabulary training. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 11-133. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.1.6
40. Ordoñez, R. (2020). Self-assessment to improve word recognition in readings (Master’s thesis, Guayaquil, Universidad Casa Grande). Retrieved from: http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/handle/ucasagrande/ 1820
41. Ozdemir, S. (2018). Effect of summarization strategies teaching on strategy usage and narrative text summarization success. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 2199-2209. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2018.061018
42. First Steps in Literacy. (2013). Reading course book (1st ed). 26. Prince Andrew Place: Pearson Canada Inc. Retrieved from: https://arpdcresources.ca/resources/first_steps_in_literacy/documents/reading-course-book.pdf
43. Perlaza, J. (2020). Peer Assessment of Skimming and Scanning to Improve Reading Comprehension (Master’s thesis, Guayaquil, Universidad Casa Grande). Retrieved from: http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/handle/ucasagrande/ 2259
44. Rayner, K., Foorman, B., Perfetti, C., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. (2001). How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2(2): 31-74. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.00004
45. Roembke, T., Hazeltine, E., Reed, D., & McMurray, B. (2019). Automaticity of word recognition Is a unique predictor of reading fluency in middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 314-330. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000279
46. Ruiz, R. (2019). Classifying Vocabulary into Parts of Speech to Improve Reading Comprehension (Master’s thesis, Guayaquil, Universidad Casa Grande). Retrieved from: http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/handle/ucasagrande/ 1926
47. Ruiz, Y. (2015). Improving reading comprehension through the use of interactive reading strategies: A quantitative study. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix Educational Technology, Phoenix, United States). Retrieved from http://www.proquest.com United States.
48. Ruiz, C. & Ruiz, R. (2014). Factors that influence the English language teaching-learning process in Ecuadorian private schools. (Unpublished thesis). UTPL. Loja. Retrieved from http://dspace.utpl.edu.ec/handle/123456789/9274
49. Sadiku, P. (2015). The importance of four skills reading, speaking, writing, listening in a lesson hour. European Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(1), 29-31. Retrieved from: http://journals.euser.org/index.php/ejls/article/view/558
50. Scammacca, N., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., & Stuebing, K. (2013). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4-12: 1980-2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 1-49. doi:10.1177/0022219413504995
51. Scarborough, H. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading disabilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97-110). New York, NY: Guilford.
52. Schachter, P., & Shopen, T. (2007). Parts-of-speech systems. Language Typology and Syntactic Description (pp. 1-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511619427.001
53. Shanahan, T. (2018). How do I teach main idea? Blogs about reading. Shanahan on literacy. Retrieved from: https://www.readingrockets.org/blogs/shanahan-literacy/how-do-i-teach-main-idea
54. Subayil, S. (2017).The descriptive study on students’ reading comprehension in scanning recount text of the eighth grade students at SMP N 1 Glagah in the 2013/2014 academic year. Lunar 1(02), 48-58. doi: 10.36526/In.v1i02.464.
55. Sukanya, K. & Nutprapha K. (2017). A study of parts of speech used in online student weekly magazine. International Journal of Research, 5(4), 43-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.569978
56. Touriz, P. (2020). Reading Comprehension Using Skimming and Scanning Strategies through Collaboration Facilitated by WhatsApp (Master’s thesis, Guayaquil, Universidad Casa Grande). Retrieved from: http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/handle/ucasagrande/ 2254
57. Valencia, S., Wixson, K., & Pearson, D. (2014). Putting Text Complexity in Context: Refocusing on Comprehension of Complex Text. The Elementary School Journal, 115(2), 270-289. doi: 10.1086/678296
58. Vongkrachang, A., & Chinwonno, A. (2015). Explicit Reading Instruction to Enhance Informational Text Comprehension and Reading Engagement for Thai EFL Students. PASAA, 49(1), 67-104. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1077913.pdf
59. Wharton-McDonald, R., & Swiger, S. (2009). Developing higher order comprehension in the middle grades 1(1). Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 510-530). New York: Routledge.
60. Weekley, T. (2017). The impact of word-study intervention strategies on students' measures of reading comprehension and fluency (Doctoral Dissertation, Mississippi, University of Mississippi). Retrieved from: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/493
61. Weiser, B., & Mathes, P. (2019). Using encoding Instruction to improve the reading and spelling performances of elementary students at risk for literacy difficulties a best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research 81(2), 170-200. doi: 10.3102/0034654310396719